and thriftless B. You may argue that it is wise ''to transfer labour from one place where it is not wanted to another where it is." But the power of the State is limited, and it is a doubtful policy this getting rid of your labour class, unless you confine your aid exclusively to those who are a burden here. No doubt, if this could be done, it would be a great relief to get rid of the "helpless" and pauper-breeding classes; but would it be fair to the colonies to saddle them with our social failures? How long do you think they would consent to become refuges for our destitute? Calmly viewed, free from sentiment, they would like to get such men as we have not too many of ourselves-industrious, skilful mechanics-men that can be of service, men that are useful, and can earn their living anywhere, everywhere. Emigration needs no artificial help. In 1883, 320,000 persons of British and Irish origin left our shores (about 1 per cent. of the population), and this rate is greater than it has been at any previous period. The population of Ireland is steadily decreasing; why not use this part of the United Kingdom as an absorbent for our "surplus" population?

The law of supply and demand applies to emigration as to everything else. The State may send out labour, but it is wiser to trust to the "demand for labour" in our colonies attracting the "necessary supply" as it is needed. Education is becoming general; the population of our agricultural districts is becoming better informed; the temptation to this class is great to save more and go where their particular labour is better